Posts Tagged ‘NOTHING’
Stocks – Are they nothing more than a piece of paper?
Posted by admin in Finance Thursday, 19 August 2010 15:32 No Comments
Contrary to popular opinion, are the stocks not just a piece of paper. If you own a portfolio of stocks you actually own tiny fractions of several companies. P> If you think that this is not the case, just ask the lucky owner of Petco or Reebok stocks. In each case the company wanted a larger company to buy. The only path to take over a company with publicly traded shares is to buy all the shares. P>
Had Petco Reebok and stocks at $ 20 and $ 35 per piece, you would sell it to a larger company for less than that? Of course not. For $ 20 and $ 35? Probably not, because if you want these prices you could have sold your shares on the open market. to take p> The only way for larger firms is smaller, offering a premium to the holders of its shares. Petco in case, for example, shareholders will receive a premium of 50 percent. That is, if you had stock worth $ 10,000 Petco, the very next day, you would have had $ 15,000. Not bad for a day! P>
big wins like this can happen only when you start to take the initiative investment in shares. But if you still think that the stock no real value, read on. P>
which shares its value is? P> shares rise in value because they are needed. Shares are in value because they are not asked. This is the simple truth, but a misunderstanding there, the idea that stocks are “just a piece of paper does.” P>
Sometimes shares have increased or decreased demand for no good reason. But the root value of the shares, the value to find the underlying companies. P> Stocks in Action – Fed Ex p> For example, take a look at a relatively stable companies like Fed Ex (FDX Ticker). It had a net profit of $ 1 Eight billion in 2005. Since Fed Ex 305 million shares of shares outstanding, this represents about $ 5. 1990 earnings per share (EPS). P>
Fed Ex stock is around $ 112 per share. This means it’s P / E ratio is about 19 (112 / 5 90 = 18 98), which on the average P / E ratio for stocks in the S & P 500. P> If you have a share of their own Fed Ex, you own a share of their profits. You have a share in cash in his bank account, and once a part of its fixed assets and equipment. In the case of Fed Ex, you own one share of each of their trucks! P> Now of course if you own 100 shares of Fed Ex, that’s only 100 shares from more than 300 million – even one million shares (worth 112 million U.S. dollars) would be less than one-third of 1 percent the company! In other words, your one shares do not entitle you to a lot of decision making with what is with that $ 5. 90th P>
Maybe she likes to buy more trucks, Advertise more, or maybe even send a check for $ 5 90 (a dividend). But you’re just a little guy, and no one listens to the little guy. However, you can choose to vote in the elections, shareholder of the Company’s Board of Directors. P>
The owners of the stocks monitored monitored the Board monitors the Management Board, the CEO and the CEO of the company. More precisely, shares work. P>
The real value of the shares – if the holdings of other stocks you can not then decide what to do with, Fed Ex’s $ 5. 90 in profits, because you only have 100 votes of 305 million euros (you get one vote per share of stock you own). But you know who decides what Fed Ex would do, could? Someone who owned all 350 million shares. P> Let’s say that the stock market took a real nose dive for some reason. That can happen. But let’s also say that Fed Ex kept rolling business to generate profits in the $ 1. 8000000000 spectrum, as it was in 2005. P>
How deep can the stock go? Imagine the stock went from $ 112 down to $ 45. Now its P / E would 7th 6 (45 / 5 90 = 7 6), provided they continued to produce at $ 5. 90 each in the share data. At that price could be the entire Fed Ex company an attractive candidate for acquisition will be someone like UPS. P>
UPS bought all 305 million shares of the Fed Ex could do what she wanted with $ 5. 90 – it would be money in the bank. Better still, by a reduction in competition and the elimination of some overlapping costs $ 5. 90 per share could easily turn into $ 6. 50th P>
How much would you sell your shares of $ 45 Fed Ex? Less than $ 45? Of course not. You will be surprised, but UPS may be willing to offer as much as $ 65 if they thought it could get Fed Ex Win up to $ 6. 50 (so recovering their investments in ten years). P> Now you could say, “Hey, wait. I bought the stock at $ 112 and I should be happy I can sell it for $ 65?” This is not the point. The point is that stocks have to do real value. If you are a conservative investor, you want to buy stocks that are already beaten, and possibly become a takeover candidate. P>
only the possibility that someone holds to acquire an entire company shares fall too low. That makes shares more than just a piece of paper. P> William Smith, the author much more financial information on many topics, and the secret of his success in the market along with 5 Free power stock picks daily so grab your Free subscription on his website at Stock Picks a> (everything is free ) p>
Make Money Selling Nothing on eBay®
Posted by admin in Finance Tuesday, 13 July 2010 00:41 No Comments
You already know about making money by selling things on eBay®, but what if you could enhance your bank account by not selling things?
Make Money Selling Nothing on eBay®
Make Money Selling Nothing On eBay(R).
Posted by admin in Finance Monday, 5 July 2010 08:30 No Comments
You Already Know About Making Money By Selling Things On eBay(R), But What If You Could Enhance Your Bank Account By Not Selling Things?
Make Money Selling Nothing On eBay(R).
‘A Universe From Nothing’ by Lawrence Krauss, AAI 2009
Posted by admin in Finance Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:51 28 Comments
Lawrence Krauss gives a talk on our current picture of the universe, how it will end, and how it could have come from nothing. Krauss is the author of many bestselling books on Physics and Cosmology, including “The Physics of Star Trek.” Books by Lawrence Krauss: www.amazon.com Download Quicktime version Small: c0116791.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com 720p HD: c0116791.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com Filmed & Edited by JOSH TIMONEN The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science richarddawkinsfoundation.org Atheist Alliance International http
Ain’t Nothing Can Stop Us!
Posted by admin in Finance Friday, 14 May 2010 00:05 30 Comments
The Russians talk to Tony and David on NWA World Championship Wrestling, but first, the greatest intro of all time. 4.20.85
Alex Breaks Down Left-Wing Blame Game as Nothing More Than a False Flag on The Alex Jones Show
Posted by admin in Finance Tuesday, 11 May 2010 13:06 25 Comments
Alex breaks down how the far-left always attack themselves only to blame it on their counter parts, which means it’s only a matter of time before they set-up the American people for a false flag event to usher in full martial law giving the UN total control of the USA for good. www.prisonplanet.tv http
Stocks – Are They Nothing More Than Pieces of Paper?
Contrary to popular belief, stocks are not just pieces of paper. When you own a portfolio of stocks, you really own tiny fractions of several companies.
If you think that this isn’t the case, just ask the lucky owners of Petco or Reebok stocks. In each company’s case, a larger company wanted to buy them. The only way to take over a company with publicly traded stocks is to buy all of the shares.
If you had Petco and Reebok stocks at $20 and $35 apiece, would you sell them to a larger company for less than that? Of course not. For $20 and $35? Probably not, since if you wanted those prices, you could have sold your stocks in the open market.
The only way for larger companies to take over smaller ones is to offer a premium to the owners of their stocks. In Petco’s case, for example, the stockholders received a 50 percent premium. That means if you had $10,000 worth of Petco stock, the very next day you would have had $15,000. Not bad for a day’s work!
Big profits like this can only happen when you take the initiative to start investing in stocks. But if you still think that stocks don’t have real value, read on.
What Gives Stocks Their Value?
Stocks go up in value because they are in demand. Stocks go down in value because they’re not in demand. This is the simple truth, but a misunderstanding of it leads to the notion that stocks are “just pieces of paper.”
Sometimes, stocks have an increased or decreased demand for no good reason. But the root value of stocks can be found in the value of their underlying businesses.
Stocks in Action – Fed Ex
For example, take a look at fairly stable company like Fed Ex (ticker FDX). It had annual profits of $1.8 billion in 2005. Since Fed Ex has 305 million shares of stock outstanding, this equals about $5.90 earnings per share (EPS).
Fed Ex’s share price is around $112 per share. This means it’s P/E ratio is about 19 (112 / 5.90 = 18.98), which is about the average P/E ratio for stocks in the S&P 500.
When you own a share of Fed Ex, you own a share of its profits. You own a share of the cash in its bank account, and you even own a share of its property, plant, and equipment. In the case of Fed Ex, you own a share of each of its trucks!
Now of course, if you own 100 shares of Fed Ex, that’s only 100 shares out of more than 300 million – even a million shares ($112 million worth) would be less than 1/3 of 1 percent of the company! In other words, your one share doesn’t entitle you to much decision-making power with what is done with that $5.90.
You might like them to buy more trucks, advertise more, or maybe even send you the check for $5.90 (a dividend). But you’re just a little guy, and nobody listens to the little guy. You can, however, vote in shareholder elections to decide the corporation’s board of directors.
The owners of stocks oversee the board, the board oversees the CEO, and the CEO oversees the company. That’s how owning stocks works.
The Real Value of Stocks – When Stocks Buy Other Stocks
So you can’t decide what to do with Fed Ex’s $5.90 in profits, because you only have 100 votes out of 305 million (you get one vote per share of stock that you own). But you know who could decide what Fed Ex would do? Someone who owned all 350 million shares.
Let’s say that the stock market took a real nose dive for some reason. That can happen. But let’s also say that Fed Ex’s business kept rolling along, generating profits in the $1.8 billion range like it did in 2005.
How low could the stock go? Imagine the stock went from $112 all the way down to $45. Now its P/E ratio would be 7.6 (45 / 5.90 = 7.6), assuming it continued to generate $5.90 in earnings per share. At this price, the entire Fed Ex company might be an attractive acquisition candidate for someone like UPS.
If UPS bought all 305 million shares of Fed Ex, it could do whatever it wanted with that $5.90 – it would be money in the bank. Better yet, by reducing competition and eliminating some overlapping costs, that $5.90 per share could easily turn into $6.50.
So how much would you sell your $45 share of Fed Ex for? Less than $45? Of course not. You’d be surprised, but UPS might be willing to offer as much as $65, if it thought it could get Fed Ex’s profits up to $6.50 (thereby recovering their investment in ten years).
Now you might be saying, “Hey, wait. I bought the stock at $112 and I’m supposed to be happy I can sell it for $65?” That’s not the point. The point is that stocks do have real value. If you’re a conservative investor, you want to buy stocks that are already beaten down and could potentially become acquisition candidates.
Just the possibility that someone could acquire an entire company keeps stocks from falling too low. And that’s what makes stocks more than just pieces of paper.
William Smith the author provides much more financial information on many subjects as well as the secret to his success in the market along with 5 Free power stock picks emailed daily so grab your Free subscription on his website at Stock Picks (All is Free)
Investing is Too Risky, Instead I’ll Do Nothing
Does this sound familiar? Isn’t it interesting that the common perception amongst the public is that investing is way too risky ? What’s even more interesting is that if you asked any poor or middle class person how they thought the Rich made their money almost all of them would include ‘Investing’ in their answer. So if poor people know that wealthy people are ‘Investors’ then why on earth do they believe that it is too risky for them to get involved?
Â
The answer is simple
Â
Humans are terrified of anything that they don’t know or understand. In the immortal words of Garth from Wayne’s World “We fear change”.
Â
So am I saying ‘Investing is not risky?’ Not at all, in fact if you don’t understand it or aren’t properly educated Investing is incredibly dangerous and risky. But the same can be said about almost every daily activity that we undertake. Whether it be swimming, crossing the road, riding a bike, driving a car or even eating a chicken wing – all of these activities would be highly dangerous if we hadn’t been taught or shown how to do them properly. Luckily for us our parents took us to swimming lessons when we were children but unfortunately for us our parents never seemed to take us to Investment school. Instead they taught us what their parents taught them about Money & Investing – and that was “to earn money you need to work hard”
Â
Well I’ll tell you now that if you want to become financially successful and a master of wealth creation you will need to step our of your parents shadows and learn that ‘Rich people don’t work for money, they let their money work for them’.
Â
I was first introduced to this concept in high school when I read ‘Rich Dad, Poor Dad’ but it wasn’t until a few years later that I truly understood the concept of having your money work for you.
Â
When I finished university I decided I wanted to travel the world for 6 months so I began working my backside off to try and finance the trip. Whilst I was confident of my saving ability in the back of my mind I knew that I could always fall back on some money that my granddad had given me in the previous year. As an early inheritance he had invested $7k (plus $3k of my own savings) into some shares that I knew very little about (other than the fact that if my ‘overseas trip fund’ was running low I had a backup plan).
Â
To cut a long story short I managed to have the most amazing trip without eating into my Granddads shares. But more importantly when I was overseas I met a fellow Australian traveler who was funding his trip by trading the stock market in internet cafes all over Europe (earning between $5-$15k per month). Needless to say my interest in the Stock market suddenly grew and as soon as I got home I decided to see how my own shares were going.
Â
Well to my great surprise the $10,000 that had originally been invested had now grown to $16,000. So whist I had been climbing the Eiffel Tower and watching the Aurora Borealis in Norway my money had been hard at work. What an amazing and life changing feeling!
Â
So how can you learn to make your money work for you?
Â
Well as I found out this question is harder to answer that you might expect. After learning about my shares success I couldn’t help myself from telling everyone I knew but for some strange reason no one seemed to share my enthusiasm. All everyone could say was “be careful, the stock market is very risky’ or they would tell me stories about how their ‘nephews, cousins, friend had once lost all their money on the stock exchange’. At this stage my head was starting to hurt and I didn’t know who or what to believe. Just recently I found a great quote by Kurek Ashley that summed up the position that I was in perfectly:
Â
“The most expensive advice you will ever get, is free from poor people”
Â
If you look at what this quote really means you will be able to understand why the average person believes that investing is too risky. It is simply because your typical ‘poor to middle class’ person is receiving their advice from a fellow ‘poor to middle class’ person. Surely this is a case of the blind leading the blind, or at best the blind leading the severely visually impaired.
Â
If your child wanted to be a professional gymnast and you knew nothing about gymnastics what would you do? Obviously you would find the best Coach/School and you would let them teach your child. Well the same principle applies if you want to be financially successful. You need to find Mentors, books, DVD’s, Seminars anything or anyone that knows more about Wealth Creation than you do and gradually build up your knowledge. Then eventually like a professional surfer glides over the waves you can successfully let your money work for you rather than drowning in an ocean of uncertainty and risk. As Warren Buffet once said “Risk is not knowing what you’re doing”
Â
So you are now faced with a few options
Â
Not invest and spend the rest of your life ‘working for money’Invest your hard earned money before you are educated enough, loose your life savings and in turn become one of those people who tell everyone else that “Don’t invest, it’s too risky, the stock market stole everything I had”Or you can dedicate yourself to learning about Investment strategies and techniques and gradually build up your confidence until you become a successful Investor and let your money work for you.
Â
So are there risks with Investing? YES of course there are, but like swimming, crossing the road, riding a bike and driving a car once you educate yourself you lower these risks and in turn get to enjoy the wonderful benefits.
Â
Surely NOT investing is the biggest Risk of all.
Â
For access to a Free Investment DVD and an amazing Free Wealth Creation pack valued at over $1000 simple go to http://www.sharespropertymoney.com/ Take your first steps towards a successful financial future and begin your education today.
Mint Condition Video: Nothing Left to Say
Posted by admin in Finance Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:58 26 Comments
This video for Mint Condition, a successful Twin Cities-based R&B group, is for “Nothing Left to Say,” from the band’s new album “eLife.” It was created by the faculty and students of Globe University/Minnesota School of Business (www.msbcollege.edu ). Members of the school’s Music Business program and Digital Video and Media Production program directed, produced, shot, edited, and did all post-production work for the video, which debuted on BET January 1, 2009. See more work by the video’s director, Wayne Johnson, at http
Coming Commercial Real Estate Collaspe- NOTHING can prevent NEXT real estate crash?!?!
Posted by admin in Finance Friday, 30 April 2010 09:02 25 Comments
Watch My LIVE Broadcasts (On-Demand): www.livestream.com Add me as a friend on Facebook! www.facebook.com Get DAILY GrowBy10 Updates on Twitter! twitter.com Aug. 10 (Bloomberg) — The collapse in commercial real estate is preventing Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke from declaring the economy and financial markets are healed. Property values have fallen 35 percent since October 2007, according to Moodys Investors Service. Thats making it tough for owners to refinance almost $165 billion of mortgages for skyscrapers, shopping malls and hotels this year, pressuring companies such as Maguire Properties Inc., the largest office landlord in downtown Los Angeles, to put buildings up for sale. Negative Fundamental Demand for commercial space comes from employment and the income generated by that employment, said University of Pennsylvania Professor Joseph Gyourko, director of the Wharton Schools Samuel Zell and Robert Lurie Real Estate Center in Philadelphia. Mounting job losses are a really significant negative fundamental, signaling that conditions are going to be tough for the industry for a while, he said. That may spill over into mounting losses at some banks. Forty-seven percent of loans at the 7000-plus smaller US lenders are in commercial real estate, compared with 17 percent for the biggest banks, according to New York-based Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Recent Comments