@ DEdGrimley I felt strange that I was writing to nehmen.Wie to defend something that I knew was also gebrochen.Das system of people who are defending the status quo or patching it manages not fix it. I felt that the part I wanted to add, was the concept of “ppl”, as “the people”. But there is no organized movement that consciously know fill this role noch.USA lack of compensatory Faktoren.TYT know many unionists and most normal people need Sinn.Unsere companies to break the mold.
@ DEdGrimley Jefferson knew clearly that there is a temptation sein.Es more to it these days but tends IMO.Capital itself to the monopoly, corps are trying to win – so the level of investment continues to increase in order to increase competitive advantage . The politicians need money for the Wahlen.Setzen you build it together and a house of cards The poten only way to take apart a house of cards is safe from the Spitze.ppl the taxes must hyper-rich back to Earth orbit. sane discussion of sustainable growth on the agenda again.
@ MarsCubedEs is that in America we always back to “our founding fathers for wisdom, strange look, as deities and flawless. . . And we love to talk about Thomas Jefferson, whenever we can and he’s not uncomfortable religious domination of the political scene. Well, Thomas Jefferson once said that he thought that the banks were still dangerous and more powerful than any standing army. If we do not put controls and regulations in force to stop them, they would rule the world. Oops.
@ KKDragonLordIch can not quite understand what you say. In America, ie subsidiaries of corporations from other companies stehen.Soweit political and economic systems, I agree that the combination of democracy with capitalism seems the best, because there are two electoral systems which means a separation of regulatory powers and trade. Our problem is that the separation, there is little, so that instead of two complementary systems, which we always get a: fascism.
@ TheGiantRobot capitalism of the rich and powerful leaded when others are allowed to compete with them, as the case of subsidiaries, the rich and powerful could lose business, the “underdevelopment of countries keep”, where they are, the first- World countries have subsidiaries appeal to curb stop her from damaging their own success. Democracy and capitalism are the management of the interests of minorities in the charge (even if his “best” we have come this far, they tell us)
@ ASRIBEIRIO Almost certainly huh? Very convincing. . . Transparency is a bad thing right? I see that as long as thinly veiled keep trades happened before anything bad happen?
Why is Johnson will support derivatives on stock exchanges? Pre-trade transparency of prices is almost certainly a bad thing in a market as thin traded as OTC derivatives. All this would do is drain liquidity from the market. The only reason why you do not see this problem in the stock market that stocks are extremely liquid, derivatives are not. You should be traded to the clearing houses – not the exchange. Unless he’s one of those idiots who do not know the difference, which is certainly possible.
If it at Cap $ 100,000,000,000 $ 99,000,000,000 and a bank goes down, to relax them you need to sell assets to another institution – pushing over the $ 100,000,000,000 cap. If you do not, you have is a disorderly resolution – what you wanted to avoid in the first place. And I guarantee you, no supervisor can be a Sun conservatorship over $ 50000000000 handle that off the table. And look, if more than one bank failed in a recession (which will be there)! Size caps are logically untenable.
@ MarmaladeINFPParlamentarische democracy with a unicameral parliament of 200 represents a fifth of the population 4 million. Three major parties, no one holds absolute power, several smaller parties. / Wiki / Parliament_of_finland / wiki / Politics_of_finland
@ DEdGrimley I felt strange that I was writing to nehmen.Wie to defend something that I knew was also gebrochen.Das system of people who are defending the status quo or patching it manages not fix it. I felt that the part I wanted to add, was the concept of “ppl”, as “the people”. But there is no organized movement that consciously know fill this role noch.USA lack of compensatory Faktoren.TYT know many unionists and most normal people need Sinn.Unsere companies to break the mold.
@ MarsCubedGenau. Amen, brotha.
@ DEdGrimley Jefferson knew clearly that there is a temptation sein.Es more to it these days but tends IMO.Capital itself to the monopoly, corps are trying to win – so the level of investment continues to increase in order to increase competitive advantage . The politicians need money for the Wahlen.Setzen you build it together and a house of cards The poten only way to take apart a house of cards is safe from the Spitze.ppl the taxes must hyper-rich back to Earth orbit. sane discussion of sustainable growth on the agenda again.
@ MarsCubedEs is that in America we always back to “our founding fathers for wisdom, strange look, as deities and flawless. . . And we love to talk about Thomas Jefferson, whenever we can and he’s not uncomfortable religious domination of the political scene. Well, Thomas Jefferson once said that he thought that the banks were still dangerous and more powerful than any standing army. If we do not put controls and regulations in force to stop them, they would rule the world. Oops.
@ TheGiantRobot good points
@ KKDragonLordIch can not quite understand what you say. In America, ie subsidiaries of corporations from other companies stehen.Soweit political and economic systems, I agree that the combination of democracy with capitalism seems the best, because there are two electoral systems which means a separation of regulatory powers and trade. Our problem is that the separation, there is little, so that instead of two complementary systems, which we always get a: fascism.
@ TheGiantRobot capitalism of the rich and powerful leaded when others are allowed to compete with them, as the case of subsidiaries, the rich and powerful could lose business, the “underdevelopment of countries keep”, where they are, the first- World countries have subsidiaries appeal to curb stop her from damaging their own success. Democracy and capitalism are the management of the interests of minorities in the charge (even if his “best” we have come this far, they tell us)
@ ASRIBEIRIO Almost certainly huh? Very convincing. . . Transparency is a bad thing right? I see that as long as thinly veiled keep trades happened before anything bad happen?
Why is Johnson will support derivatives on stock exchanges? Pre-trade transparency of prices is almost certainly a bad thing in a market as thin traded as OTC derivatives. All this would do is drain liquidity from the market. The only reason why you do not see this problem in the stock market that stocks are extremely liquid, derivatives are not. You should be traded to the clearing houses – not the exchange. Unless he’s one of those idiots who do not know the difference, which is certainly possible.
If it at Cap $ 100,000,000,000 $ 99,000,000,000 and a bank goes down, to relax them you need to sell assets to another institution – pushing over the $ 100,000,000,000 cap. If you do not, you have is a disorderly resolution – what you wanted to avoid in the first place. And I guarantee you, no supervisor can be a Sun conservatorship over $ 50000000000 handle that off the table. And look, if more than one bank failed in a recession (which will be there)! Size caps are logically untenable.
@ MarmaladeINFP This is just in the U.S..
@ TheGiantRobot It is capitalism, not be ignorant. Money talks bullshit and takes the bus.
Great interview with Cenk. to get very. Although I’m sure Simon was in town for the Real-Time. . .
Great interview with Cenk. to get very. Although I’m sure Simon was in town for the Real-Time. . .
What do the Rothschilds. . . . . Bahahahahaha. . . . . . . . Watch in wind. . . Baaaahahahahaha.
@ TheGiantRobotgut spoken
@ MarmaladeINFPParlamentarische democracy with a unicameral parliament of 200 represents a fifth of the population 4 million. Three major parties, no one holds absolute power, several smaller parties. / Wiki / Parliament_of_finland / wiki / Politics_of_finland